|
Warm greetings, all.
The following three items deal with the dissonance between the GATS
and public health policies
that are designed to prevent and reduce alcohol-related harm to
individuals and society.
In the first, the Ontario [Canada] Public Health Association (OPHA)
urges U.S. and EU negotiators to change their GATS
negotiating position on alcohol because "[I]f negotiations resume
and are concluded on the basis of the current
U.S.-EU [position], serious harm to public health could result,
especially in developing countries."
In the second item, Canada's Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
(CAMH) urges Canadian government ministers to maintain
a commitment government officials made in 2003 to exclude
alcohol-related services from all requests and offers Canada makes
in the current round of GATS negotiations. CAMH also raises
concerns about ongoing GATS negotiations on Domestic Regulation
restrictions, calling them a "threat to health-based alcohol policy."
The third item is a new report, published in the journal Drug
and Alcohol Review, on aspects of GATS and other trade
agreements
that "challenge tobacco and alcohol control policies", by Donald W.
Zeigler, of the American Medical Association.
Please excuse any cross-posting...
I hope you find these items of value in your continuing work.
Best regards,
Jim Grieshaber-Otto
Cedar Isle Research
Agassiz, B.C. Canada
---------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Ontario Public Health Association letter urges US and EU
negotiators to withdraw “plurilateral” GATS request on beverage
alcohol distribution
Excerpts of Nov. 27, 2006 letter to U.S. Trade Representative Susan
Schwab and European Commissioner for Trade Peter Mandelson from
Ontario Public Health Association President Dr. Garry Aslanyan:
“There is a growing recognition
that alcohol, like tobacco, is a global health issue.”
[...]
“We are writing
to express our concern that the U.S. And European Union negotiating
position involving beverage alcohol in WTO services negotiations
could harm public health in many countries. In particular, the U.S.
And EU are jointly sponsoring a ‘plurilateral’ (or collective)
request in Distribution Services in negotiations on the General
Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) which, if adopted, would
obstruct governments’ ability to implement policies that reduce the
substantial harm caused by alcohol. We urge you to reconsider this
request.”
[...]
“...[T]he U.S.
And EU are pressuring other countries to make full national
treatment and market access commitments “with no limitations” in
Distribution Services, which generally includes alcohol. This
pressure, from two of the most powerful WTO members, makes it more
difficult for recipient country governments to adopt the very
policies that recent evidence shows to be among the most effective
in reducing the serious harm caused by alcohol in society.”
[...]
“Alcohol is no
ordinary commodity. We encourage you to take advantage of the
current hiatus in WTO negotiations to ensure that GATS and other
trade treaty negotiations do not undermine domestic health-based
alcohol policies. As a first step, we urge you to either withdraw
your support for the plurilateral request on Distribution Services
or specify that it does not apply to beverage alcohol distribution.”
The entire letter appears at:
http://web.archive.org/web/19960101-re_/http://www.opha.on.ca/advocacy/letters/GATSandAlcohol-27Nov06.pdf
2. [Canada’s]
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health letter urges Canadian
negotiators to: continue to exclude alcohol from all of Canada’s GATS requests and offers;
ensure that GATS Domestic Regulation restrictions do not apply to
alcohol regulation
Excerpts of Nov. 25, 2006 letter to
Canada’s Minister of Health Tony
Clement and Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Trade
David Emerson from Canadian Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Executive Vice President and General Counsel Gail Czukar:
“We are writing to
express our concern regarding the United States and European Union
“plurilateral” request on Distribution Services in negotiations on
the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). [...] If accepted
by Canada,
this commitment would have serious implications for alcohol policy.”
[...]
“An
additional threat to health-based alcohol policy is the proposed
negotiation of new restrictions on GATS Domestic Regulation. These
rules, if agreed to, could affect many alcohol-related measures.”
[...]
“It is essential
that the federal government of Canada recognize the status of
alcohol as a unique and potentially harmful commodity in its
international trade agreements and ongoing negotiations.
We ask that Canada maintain its September 2003
commitment to exclude alcohol-related services from all requests and
offers it makes in negotiations on GATS. In the event
that the US-EU request is accepted, protective limitations should be
made to exempt alcohol services from
Canada’s commitment. In addition,
we
recommend that the federal
government ensure that any restrictions on Domestic Regulation that
are agreed to do not apply to health-based alcohol regulation.”
3. New article:
“International trade agreements challenge tobacco and alcohol
control policies”
Drug and Alcohol Review
(November 2006), 25, 567 – 579:
International trade agreements challenge tobacco and alcohol control
policies
DONALD W. ZEIGLER, Office of Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Abuse
Prevention, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, USA
Abstract: This report reviews aspects of trade agreements that
challenge tobacco and alcohol control policies. Trade agreements
reduce barriers, increase competition, lower prices and promote
consumption. Conversely, tobacco and alcohol control measures seek
to reduce access and consumption, raise prices and restrict
advertising and promotion in order to reduce health and social
problems. However, under current and pending international
agreements, negotiated by trade experts without public health input,
governments and corporations may challenge these protections as
constraints on trade. Advocates must recognise the inherent
conflicts between free trade and public health and work to exclude
alcohol and tobacco from trade agreements. The Framework Convention
on Tobacco Control has potential to protect tobacco policies and
serve as a model for alcohol control.
For a link to this article, see:
http://www.cpath.org/id8.html
We are grateful to CPATH for bringing
this article to our attention on the Globalization and Health
listserv, and apologize for any cross-posting.
The Globalization & Health list is
administered by CPATH (Center for Policy Analysis on Trade and
Health). CPATH brings a public health voice to trade and sustainable
development..
WWW.cpath.org
The listserv is a discussion group,
an information source, and an organizing tool for people concerned
about the impact of economic globalization on health.
To subscribe, send a blank message
to:
globalizationandhealth-subscribe@topica.Com
To send a message:
globalizationandhealth-post-@topica.Com
|